Online Gambling Casinos with Online Casino Reviews

Gambling PhD Menu
Gambling Phd Home
Online Casino Gambling
Online Gambling Tips
Casino Bonus Offers
History of Gambling
Psychology Information
Social Issues
International Gaming
Gambling Terms
Pilarski Wager Articles
Internet Gaming News
The Casino TV Show


  Casino En Ligne

Golden Palace

Online Gambling Info



 

D.C. casino supporters try for appeal

In Washington, casino supporters fought to get their proposal on the ballot Wednesday, telling an appeals court that city election officials improperly threw out thousands of petition signatures.

Lawyer George Jones tried to argue the District of Columbia Board of Elections and Ethics was wrong to toss thousands of signatures on the grounds that circulators misrepresented the ballot initiative, and wore T-shirts touting jobs and health care.

Jones told the D.C. Court of Appeals the statements are considered political speech and are protected by the First Amendment. But he was repeatedly interrupted by questions from the three-judge panel.

Judge Theodore Newman inquired as to how many signatures officials removed because of fraud and how many were tossed over allegedly misleading statements.

Casino proponents submitted 56,000 signatures. It is noted that after the names were checked against voter rolls, 21,279 signatures remained.

Newman said the court should not be spending time analyzing the constitutional issue if the signatures thrown out for fraud put proponents below the required 17,599 valid signatures.

Jones promised those numbers and stated that he did not challenge the signatures rejected for fraud. That includes more than 6,200 omitted after some circulators admitted forging names from phone books.

It is said that the court is expected to rule some time this month. Supporters are hoping for a favorable decision in time for voters to be able to decide in November on their plan to put 3,500 video lottery terminals in a casino to be built in a rundown section of Northeast Washington. Mayor Anthony A. Williams and several members of the D.C. Council oppose the plan.

Judge Michael Farrell noted the possibility of returning the case to the DCBOEE for a decision that disregards the issue of petition gatherers' statements.






 

Online Gambling PhD Online Casinos 2003 - Contact: phd@gamblingphd.com - Gambling Resources - Wagering