Online Gambling Casinos with Online Casino Reviews

Gambling PhD Menu
Gambling Phd Home
Online Casino Gambling
Online Gambling Tips
Casino Bonus Offers
History of Gambling
Psychology Information
Social Issues
International Gaming
Gambling Terms
Pilarski Wager Articles
Internet Gaming News
The Casino TV Show


Party Poker

Casino En Ligne

Lucky Emperor Casino

Viper Casino

Casinos En Linea

Online Gambling Info



 

Living in P. T. Barnum’s world

Dear Mark,
 I recently visited an Indian Casino in Minnesota that offered 3-card
poker. Every player at the table had to pay 50 cents just to play. I
asked what the 50 cents was for, and was told that it is the only
profit the casino has in 3-card poker. I find that hard to believe
since I do not know of a casino game that does not have some kind of
house edge. I rather think it’s greed. Any comments other than to stay
away. D.B.

In poker, the fifty cent juice per hand is called the rake; money that
the casino charges for each hand of poker. It is usually a percentage
or flat fee of the pot—in this case fifty cents from each players
hand—after each round of betting.

Normally, this fee is tolerable in poker because players do not bet
against the house, but against each other. How else is the casino going
to pay for their employees, playing tables and neon lights?

However, you were hoodwinked, okay, suckered, into giving up the
additional fifty cents per hand because 3-card poker DOES have a
built-in casino advantage.

Even if you were to employ a sound betting strategy like not making the
“play” wager unless your hand consists of at least a queen, six, and a
four in your hand, the house edge on the “ante” wager is about 2.1%,
with the “pair plus” slightly higher at 2.3%. A bearable casino
advantage, yes, but it does not merit you giving the casino an
additional fifty cents per hand.

Giving them their supplementary fifty cents is akin to being suckered
into making a sucker bet, which, if you do not know the difference,
makes you the sucker.

Dear Mark,
Aunt Felicia was always going to teach me Panoochi, a card game that
had brought her a tidy nest egg, but she died before she thought I was
old enough to benefit from the knowledge. Can you explain the game?
Aaron K.

At first, Aaron, I hit a wall finding anything regarding the card game
panoochi, even with obvious resources like Hoyle, Scarne on Cards or a
internet Google search. So, I went to my ace-in-the-hole, Area 51’s
living legend, Blackjack Jack, who straightaway knew the skinny on
panoochi.

Blackjack Jack, via snail mail (he rightfully believes his telephone is
tapped) informed me that panoochi is a card game, a friendly scam if
you will, invented way back when by Zeppo Marx and Benny Rubin, who
instead of participating in general societal uplift, duped those
willing to part with their money with this timekiller card game.

Panoochi has a vague resemblance to poker, in that the cards are
shuffled, cut and dealt. Those in on the gag know that there
are actually no rules or method of play, except for the rule
that none of them can admit to the sucker amongst them that there
are no rules. A panoochi player could do, play or say anything, so long
as it made no sense. By the time their mark figured it out and wanted
to join in on the fun, his wallet was noticeably lighter.

My first fleece of fortune was against Bob Orlowski (still the best
bottom-of-the-deck dealer I’ve ever seen) when he swindled me out of my
Detroit News paper route earnings teaching me his style of poker. Yours
just happened to be against Auntie F.

Online Gambling quote of the week: “I hope I break even tonight,” was the
sucker’s philosophy. “I need the money so bad.” —Nelson Algren, The Man
with the Golden Arm (1949)


-------------------------


 

 


Online Gambling PhD Online Casinos 2003 - Contact: phd@gamblingphd.com - Gambling Resources - Wagering